View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MGP
Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 57
|
Best version of PCWH right now? |
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:48 pm |
|
|
I'm starting a new project converting an old PIC 16C design to a PIC18F452 (or 18F4520). The old software was written in BytCraft MPC so it's very similar to CCS but some conversion will be necessary. I don't use most (if any) of the CCS libraries so I don't think that will be an issue.
I haven't been using PCWH for a while so my question is, which version of PCWH is the most stable and generally bug-free right now?
I have kept up my maintenance and have downloaded most all the updates over the past two years.
Thanks for any opinions on the matter. My application is pretty simple but I am hoping to head off any known problems with the compiler that I can.
Matt |
|
|
newguy
Joined: 24 Jun 2004 Posts: 1907
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:38 pm |
|
|
I've been using 3.236 for quite a while now. No issues so far. I don't trust the newer versions - issues with RAM allocation. |
|
|
ckielstra
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 3680 Location: The Netherlands
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 3:07 am |
|
|
I'm using v3.226 for some time now and am happy with it.
V3.227 changed handling of the PIC18 high priority interrupts (disabled during memcpy and some other functions), otherwise I would upgrade to v3.236.
v3.249... I don't know, it is out there for quite some time now but still considered beta release. It has some known bugs but I don't think anything serious, or otherwise CCS would have come with a new release by now. Wouldn't they?
Anyway I think v2.236 and v2.249 are both good, most bugs in 3.249 are also present in v3.236 so it is up to you. |
|
|
MGP
Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 57
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:00 pm |
|
|
Thanks guys -- Sounds like 3.236 is pretty stable, I'll try it first and then 3.249 if I have any problems.
Matt |
|
|
|