|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Jeff d Guest
|
can someone tell me what i need to debug a 16f627 |
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:52 pm |
|
|
I need to debug a 16F627a Microcontroller. I already bought a kit150 and an icd-u40, but I dont know if these are even compatible. Can someone tell me what I need to buy to get the chip debugged? |
|
|
PCM programmer
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 21708
|
|
|
Jeff d Guest
|
thanks |
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:57 pm |
|
|
thank you. I really need to get this done |
|
|
Jeff D Guest
|
icd-u40 AC162053 |
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2005 2:03 pm |
|
|
are these two parts compatible |
|
|
PCM programmer
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 21708
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:54 pm |
|
|
Quote: | I already bought a kit150 and an icd-u40, but I dont know if these are even compatible. |
The ICD-U40 can be used as a debugger, but it requires the CCS
PCW or PCWH program to run it as a debugger. Do you have one
of those programs ? They're expensive:
Quote: |
PCW Professional Package (Windows IDE with both PCB and PCM) - $350
PCWH Professional Package (Windows IDE with PCB, PCM and PCH) - $425 |
CCS has a special student price, so if you're a student it's possible that
you could get it for less than that.
CCS has a Standalone program for the ICD-U40, but this program only
allows the ICD-U40 to act as a programmer, not as a debugging tool.
You also bought the Kit150:
http://www.dontronics.com/diyk150.html
But according to that website, it's a programmer. So unless you buy
(or already own) PCW or PCWH, then all you have right now is two
programmers: ICD-U40 and Kit150.
Quote: | Are these two parts compatible ? |
I guess you mean the 16F627A and 16F648A.
If you download the data sheet for these PICs,
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/40044D.pdf
and look at the bottom of page 3, it has a chart that shows the
differences. So they are compatible but the 16F648A has a lot
more resources.
Code: |
PIC ROM RAM EEPROM
16F627A 1024 224 128
16F628A 2048 224 128
16F648A 4096 256 256
|
Did you read the links I posted to the Microchip forum ? One of them
suggests using the 16F88, because it's very similar (but not exactly
compatible), and it doesn't require a ICD header tool to debug it --
it has ICD support built-in (as do most PICs). |
|
|
Jeff D Guest
|
debuggin 16f627a |
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:44 pm |
|
|
would someone be willing to debug a 16f627a for me? |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|