 |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cvargcal
Joined: 17 Feb 2015
Posts: 134
|
| PIC18F45K22 configuration |
 Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 3:03 pm |
 |
|
Hi, this code is for generate tone DTMF, the code working fine with the pic 16F887, but with PIC18F45K22 not, what configuration I need for see the pwm signal on CCP1?
| Code: |
/*************************************************************************/
/* DTMF.C */
/* Programa para generar tonos DTMF a partir de un teclado 4x4. */
/* Usa el módulo de Captura CCP1 en modo PWM */
/* */
/* Autor: Carlos A. Narváez */
/* Fecha: Septiembre, 2005 */
/*************************************************************************/
//! 1209Hz 1336Hz 1477Hz 1633 Hz
//!697Hz 1 2 3 A
//!770Hz 4 5 6 B
//!852Hz 7 8 9 C
//!941Hz * 0 # D
#include <18F45K22.h>
#device adc=10 // Resolucion de 1024 valores
#Device PASS_STRINGS=IN_RAM // #ZERO_RAM
#define FASTER_BUT_MORE_ROM // Variables en memoria
#fuses HSH, NOWDT, BROWNOUT, PUT, NOPBADEN, NOHFOFST //
#fuses NOPLLEN // HW PLL disabled, PLL enabled in software
#fuses MCLR // Master Clear pin enabled
#use delay(clock=20MHz,crystal=20MHz)
#use standard_io(A)
#use standard_io(B)
#use standard_io(C)
#use rs232(baud=9600,bits=8,parity=N,xmit=PIN_C6,rcv=PIN_C7,ERRORS,stream=debug)
CONST unsigned int SINE_WAVE[256] = {
128,131,134,137,140,144,147,150,153,156,159,162,165,168,171,174,
177,179,182,185,187,191,193,196,199,201,204,206,209,211,213,216,
218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,233,235,237,239,240,241,243,244,
245,246,248,249,250,250,251,252,253,253,254,254,254,255,255,255,
255,255,255,255,254,254,254,253,253,252,251,250,250,249,248,246,
245,244,243,241,240,239,237,235,234,232,230,228,226,224,222,220,
218,216,213,211,209,206,203,201,199,196,193,191,188,185,182,179,
177,174,171,168,165,162,159,156,153,150,147,144,140,137,134,131,
128,125,122,119,116,112,109,106,103,100,97,94,91,88,85,82,79,76,
74,71,68,65,63,60,57,54,52,49,47,45,43,40,38,36,34,32,30,28,26,
24,22,21,19,17,16,15,13,12,11,10,8,7,6,6,5,4,3,3,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,
1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,4,5,6,6,7,8,10,11,12,13,15,16,17,19,21,24,26,28,
30,32,34,36,38,40,43,45,47,50,52,55,57,60,63,65,68,71,74,77,79,
82,85,88,91,94,97,100,103,106,109,112,116,119,122,125,128};
unsigned long index1,index2;
int inc1,inc2;
#INT_TIMER2
void timer2_isr(void){
int wave = 0;
wave = ((long)SINE_WAVE[index1]+(long)SINE_WAVE[index2])/2;
set_pwm1_duty(wave);
index1 += inc1;
index2 += inc2;
if(index1 >= 256) index1 -= 256;
if(index2 >= 256) index2 -= 256;
}
#define DTMF_ROW1 23 // incremento para 700 Hz, cada 128us
#define DTMF_ROW2 25 // incremento para 750 Hz, cada 128us
#define DTMF_ROW3 28 // incremento para 850 Hz, cada 128us
#define DTMF_ROW4 31 // incremento para 950 Hz, cada 128us
#define DTMF_COLA 40 // incremento para 1200 Hz, cada 128us
#define DTMF_COLB 44 // incremento para 1350 Hz, cada 128us
#define DTMF_COLC 48 // incremento para 1500 Hz, cada 128us
#define DTMF_COLD 54 // incremento para 1650 Hz, cada 128us
void generate_dtmf_tone(char keypad, long duration) {
index1=0; index2=0;
inc1=0; inc2=0;
if((keypad=='1')||(keypad=='2')||(keypad=='3')||(keypad=='A')) inc1=DTMF_ROW1;
else if((keypad=='4')||(keypad=='5')||(keypad=='6')||(keypad=='B')) inc1=DTMF_ROW2;
else if((keypad=='7')||(keypad=='8')||(keypad=='9')||(keypad=='C')) inc1=DTMF_ROW3;
else if((keypad=='*')||(keypad=='0')||(keypad=='#')||(keypad=='D')) inc1=DTMF_ROW4;
if((keypad=='1')||(keypad=='4')||(keypad=='7')||(keypad=='*')) inc2=DTMF_COLA;
else if((keypad=='2')||(keypad=='5')||(keypad=='8')||(keypad=='0')) inc2=DTMF_COLB;
else if((keypad=='3')||(keypad=='6')||(keypad=='9')||(keypad=='#')) inc2=DTMF_COLC;
else if((keypad=='A')||(keypad=='B')||(keypad=='C')||(keypad=='D')) inc2=DTMF_COLD;
enable_interrupts(INT_TIMER2);
while(duration-- > 0)delay_ms(1);
disable_interrupts(INT_TIMER2);
set_pwm1_duty(0x80);
}
void main() {
char k;
set_tris_c(0x00);
setup_timer_2(T2_DIV_BY_1, 127, 5);
// Timer2 se incrementa cada 200nseg overflow cada 25.6 useg
//y genera una interrupción cada 25.6 * 5 = 128; Fs = 7812.5 Hz
setup_ccp1(CCP_PWM); // Configure CCP1 as a PWM
// El tiempo que dura un ciclo de PWM es:(1/clock)*4*t2div*(periodo+1)
// En este programa: clock=20000000 y periodo=127, entonces el periodo PWM es: (1/20000000)*4*1*128 = 25.6 us ó 39.06 khz
// Fs = 25.6 * 5 = 7812.5 Hz.
set_pwm1_duty(0x80);
fprintf(debug,"Hello!!\r\n"); // Imprimir mensaje por el UART1
while (TRUE) {
k='1';
fprintf(debug,"%d\r\n",k);
generate_dtmf_tone(k, 200);
delay_ms(2000);
k='2';fprintf(debug,"%d\r\n",k);
generate_dtmf_tone(k, 200);
delay_ms(2000);
k='3';fprintf(debug,"%d\r\n",k);
generate_dtmf_tone(k, 200);
delay_ms(2000);
k='4';fprintf(debug,"%d\r\n",k);
generate_dtmf_tone(k, 200);
delay_ms(2000);
}
} |
|
|
 |
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9221
Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:11 pm |
|
|
depending on your compiler version, you may need to add a'patch' to allow the compiler to correctly access the timer.
this....
| Code: |
//timerPWM.c
//patch to get PWM running
#byte T2CON = 0xFBA
#byte PR2 = 0xFBB
#define setup_timer_2(prescaler, PR2val, postscaler) \
if(prescaler) \
{ \
PR2 = PR2val; \
T2CON = prescaler | ((postscaler -1) << 3); \
} \
else \
T2CON = 0;
//
//end of patch
|
is what I use when coding the PIC18F46K22 a 'relative' of your PIC.
I haven't looked at any of your code( you said it works...)
Jay |
|
|
cvargcal
Joined: 17 Feb 2015
Posts: 134
|
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:34 pm |
|
|
| temtronic wrote: | depending on your compiler version, you may need to add a'patch' to allow the compiler to correctly access the timer.
this....
| Code: |
//timerPWM.c
//patch to get PWM running
#byte T2CON = 0xFBA
#byte PR2 = 0xFBB
#define setup_timer_2(prescaler, PR2val, postscaler) \
if(prescaler) \
{ \
PR2 = PR2val; \
T2CON = prescaler | ((postscaler -1) << 3); \
} \
else \
T2CON = 0;
//
//end of patch
|
is what I use when coding the PIC18F46K22 a 'relative' of your PIC.
I haven't looked at any of your code (you said it works...)
Jay |
Thanks for answer, it's the first time that I listen about this. I thought only need configure the timer2 and ccp1 as I want. mmm :/
I simulate this with the 887 and not problem... but with this pic I see none on CCP1.
I added your code, ... but still not work :/ I compile with 5.066 |
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9221
Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 5:48 pm |
|
|
I simulate this with the 887 and not problem... but with this pic I see none on CCP1.
SIMULATE ???
If this is 'Proteus' and not real hardware, then that is your problem....
Jay |
|
|
PCM programmer
Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 21708
|
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 6:40 pm |
|
|
The code obviously comes from this PDF:
http://microinternet.com.ve/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/tonos.pdf
It's the 2nd section of code, starting on page 13.
But you have changed it. You have this:
| Code: | enable_interrupts(INT_TIMER2);
while(duration-- > 0)delay_ms(1);
disable_interrupts(INT_TIMER2);
set_pwm1_duty(0x80); |
But the code in the PDF has this:
| Code: |
enable_interrupts(INT_TIMER2);
enable_interrupts(GLOBAL);
while(duration-- > 0)
{
delay_ms(1);
}
disable_interrupts(GLOBAL);
disable_interrupts(INT_TIMER2);
|
You removed the enable/disable for GLOBAL interrupts. Why ?
If you remove it, the #int_timer2 interrupt routine will never execute.
Put that code back in.
I don't guarantee that the PDF code works. I didn't test it very much.
But if you put the GLOBAL interrupts back in, you should get something.
Also, get rid of the patch posted by temtronic. It's for CCS vs. 4.114.
You have vs. 5.066. You don't need it. |
|
|
cvargcal
Joined: 17 Feb 2015
Posts: 134
|
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 6:50 pm |
|
|
| temtronic wrote: | I simulate this with the 887 and not problem... but with this pic I see none on CCP1.
SIMULATE ???
If this is 'Proteus' and not real hardware, then that is your problem....
Jay |
mmmmm I will check in real, but is curious that if sound the tone (and I can decode the tone with app android since mic of phone across of speaker of pc) with one PIC and not with other in Proteus..
Ok temtronic, thanks you so much.  |
|
|
cvargcal
Joined: 17 Feb 2015
Posts: 134
|
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:20 pm |
|
|
| PCM programmer wrote: | The code obviously comes from this PDF:
http://microinternet.com.ve/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/tonos.pdf
It's the 2nd section of code, starting on page 13.
But you have changed it. You have this:
| Code: | enable_interrupts(INT_TIMER2);
while(duration-- > 0)delay_ms(1);
disable_interrupts(INT_TIMER2);
set_pwm1_duty(0x80); |
But the code in the PDF has this:
| Code: |
enable_interrupts(INT_TIMER2);
enable_interrupts(GLOBAL);
while(duration-- > 0)
{
delay_ms(1);
}
disable_interrupts(GLOBAL);
disable_interrupts(INT_TIMER2);
|
You removed the enable/disable for GLOBAL interrupts. Why ?
If you remove it, the #int_timer2 interrupt routine will never execute.
Put that code back in.
I don't guarantee that the PDF code works. I didn't test it very much.
But if you put the GLOBAL interrupts back in, you should get something.
Also, get rid of the patch posted by temtronic. It's for CCS vs. 4.114.
You have vs. 5.066. You don't need it. |
Hi, thank
Yes I delete because it "global" this line is not necesary if is in "main". but the code working very fine in proteus, I listen the sound and decode with the cellphone.
I thinking, the pic is not running fine the timer2, maybe running this pic is hard for proteus... so I will check in real...maybe yes working... but really I see if working in proteus, working in real
But I search use this code in one RTOS with the PIC18F45K22.
Last edited by cvargcal on Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:27 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
PCM programmer
Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 21708
|
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:25 pm |
|
|
| I don't have Proteus so I can't help you anymore. |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19499
|
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:39 am |
|
|
Read the sticky at the top of the forum about Proteus.
The problem is that Proteus (actually 'Isis' the simulator, Proteus is the PCB design package), will first of all not be aware of things that are necessary to make a chip work. So you tell it 'I have this clock', and it'll accept this, even if the real chip has no clock. Then it doesn't understand supply noise (so chips will run without decoupling, while real chips fail), and it also has so many errors in it's internal 'models' of PIC parts - unfortunately, the I2C module for example has different errata on different PIC chips, but the Isis 'model' is of a single generic part.
Isis is a good way of working out things like analog filter designs, but for a PIC, time spent using the simulator is generally wasted, and in some cases it may actually 'cost' you time, making changes that then have to be completely re-done when you get to a real PIC...
You should start with a real chip, and then start simple (1 Hz flash an LED program), and verify you have got the chip working properly, before moving on to more complex tests. |
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9221
Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 6:48 am |
|
|
Mr T is 100% about proteus/Isis....It IS a terrible waste of time !! A 'simulation' will work 100% ,so you configure a PIC by the schematic and it will NOT work. You could spend hours(days ?) on the bench trouble shooting onlt yo find out that while Isis doesn't need a xtal and 2 caps to run the PIC, the Real World does !! Something so basic is,well, unforgiveable. Frankly I wouldn't trust the 'analog' side of it,maybe that really does work but do NOT trust it for any PIC projects! Think.. it can't get a simple, low level function correct so HOW could it possibly get 'complicated' things like timers, ECCP, etc. correct!
Please get a couple of PICs, some perf board, learn to solder stitch and work in the real World.
Jay |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19499
|
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:18 am |
|
|
I was talking about 'pure analog'. Not stuff involving the PIC at all. Things like simple tuned circuits or solid state filters, it seems to be using a 'core' that is almost certainly based on something like Spice. The problem with the PIC is that the models just aren't complete, and too many 'assumptions' are made.... |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ 
Search
Register
Profile 
Log in to check your private messages 
Log in
