|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
o cientista
Joined: 14 May 2012 Posts: 5
|
i2C MULTI_MASTER |
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:54 pm |
|
|
Good day. Two months ago I'm trying to do two PICs act as master and as slave in another time and work as a slave and master, but so far failed. I therefore do not know what else to do. Someone could help me. Here is the code of the master and slave.
Code: |
// MASTER
#include <16F877A.h>
#device adc=10
#FUSES NOWDT //No Watch Dog Timer
#FUSES HS //High speed Osc (> 4mhz)
#FUSES PUT //Power Up Timer
#FUSES PROTECT //Code protected from reads
#FUSES NODEBUG //No Debug mode for ICD
#FUSES BROWNOUT //Brownout reset
#FUSES NOLVP //No low voltage prgming, B3(PIC16) or B5(PIC18) used for I/O
#FUSES NOCPD //No EE protection
#FUSES NOWRT //Program memory not write protected
#use delay(clock=20M)
//NOTE: Must declare MASTER before SLAVE, i2c_isr_state() returns 0
// when MASTER is the most recent #use i2c
#use i2c(MASTER, sda=PIN_C1, scl=PIN_C0, stream=I2CM)
#use i2c(SLAVE, sda=PIN_C4, scl=PIN_C3, address=0xA0, force_hw, stream=I2CS)
#use rs232(baud=57600, parity=N, xmit=PIN_C6, rcv=PIN_C7, bits=8, stream=COM1)
#use fast_io(D)
int rcv_buf[0x10];
int wrt_buf[0x10];
int address;
#int_SSP // interrupt on i2c activity
void i2c_isr(void)
{
int state, incoming;
state = i2c_isr_state(I2CS);
if(state < 0x80)
{
incoming = i2c_read(I2CS);
if (state == 1)
{
address = incoming;
}
else if (state >= 2)
{
rcv_buf[address] = incoming;
}
}
else if(state == 0x80)
{
i2c_write(I2CS,wrt_buf[address]);
}
}
void main()
{
enable_interrupts(INT_SSP);
enable_interrupts(GLOBAL);
printf("\n\rbegin");
while (TRUE)
{
if (!input(PIN_B4))
{
i2c_start(I2CM);
i2c_write(I2CM,0xB0); //i2c address of a slave device
delay_ms(10);
i2c_write(I2CM,0x00); //1st byte to slave
delay_ms(10);
i2c_write(I2CM,0x22); //2nd byte to slave
delay_ms(10);
i2c_stop(I2CM);
}
}
} |
Code: |
//SLAVE
#include <16F877A.h>
#device adc=10
#FUSES NOWDT //No Watch Dog Timer
#FUSES HS //High speed Osc (> 4mhz)
#FUSES PUT //Power Up Timer
#FUSES PROTECT //Code protected from reads
#FUSES NODEBUG //No Debug mode for ICD
#FUSES BROWNOUT //Brownout reset
#FUSES NOLVP //No low voltage prgming, B3(PIC16) or B5(PIC18) used for I/O
#FUSES NOCPD //No EE protection
#FUSES NOWRT //Program memory not write protected
#use delay(clock=20M)
//NOTE: Must declare MASTER before SLAVE, i2c_isr_state() returns 0
// when MASTER is the most recent #use i2c
#use i2c(MASTER, sda=PIN_C1, scl=PIN_C0, stream=I2CM)
#use i2c(SLAVE, sda=PIN_C4, scl=PIN_C3, address=0xB0, force_hw, stream=I2CS)
#use rs232(baud=57600, parity=N, xmit=PIN_C6, rcv=PIN_C7, bits=8, stream=COM1)
#use fast_io(D)
int rcv_buf[0x10];
int wrt_buf[0x10];
int address;
#int_SSP // interrupt on i2c activity
void i2c_isr(void)
{
int state, incoming;
state = i2c_isr_state(I2CS);
if(state < 0x80)
{
incoming = i2c_read(I2CS);
if (state == 1)
{
address = incoming;
}
else if (state >= 2)
{
rcv_buf[address] = incoming;
}
}
else if(state == 0x80)
{
i2c_write(I2CS,wrt_buf[address]);
}
}
void main()
{
enable_interrupts(INT_SSP);
enable_interrupts(GLOBAL);
printf("\n\rbegin");
while (TRUE)
{
if (!input(PIN_B4))
{
i2c_start(I2CM);
i2c_write(I2CM,0xa0); //i2c address of a slave device
delay_ms(10);
i2c_write(I2CM,0x00); //1st byte to slave
delay_ms(10);
i2c_write(I2CM,0x22); //2nd byte to slave
delay_ms(10);
i2c_stop(I2CM);
}
}
} |
|
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 9221 Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:25 pm |
|
|
Step one. Program one PIC as a master only, the other PIC as a slave only. Then confirm your programs and PIC function 100% ! Be sure to use the correct pullups on the I2C bus lines for your Vss and speeds though.
Step two. Why do you want 'multimaster' mode with ONLY 2 PICs ??? It's not needed and complicates the whole communications between PICs. |
|
|
o cientista
Joined: 14 May 2012 Posts: 5
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:10 am |
|
|
good day! I really need communication MULTI_NASTER because I use several PIC in my project. In the example just put two to get easier for people to help me. I'm trying to do this for over two months and still could not. I'm desperate. Please someone help me! |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 19499
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:55 am |
|
|
The point is though that you need to move one step at a time. Your ISR code immediately has a fault that will stop it working (state 0x80, _must_ read the character before writing the output one), which will prevent it working, and you might have found if you had simplified, and got simple one to one I2C communication working _first_. Key thing throughout development and debugging is to always move from a known working starting point, adding the smallest amount possible, to move to the next level.
Best Wishes |
|
|
o cientista
Joined: 14 May 2012 Posts: 5
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:36 pm |
|
|
Good morning!
I'm from Brazil and speak Portuguese. Sorry for my english. I did what you said but still did not work. The problems that this program line: #use i2c(MASTER, sda=PIN_C1, scl=PIN_C0, stream=I2CM) If I comment this line pragrama it receives the ID, ADDRESS and DATA, but this way you receive the PIC will not be able to function as the master. Here, the attached photo of operating with errors. http://www.4shared.com/photo/36VTMkVt/i2c_DEBUG.html
http://www.4shared.com/photo/vWV6RBYK/I2C.html? |
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 9221 Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:41 pm |
|
|
One picture looks like Proteus.
Please tell us you're using REAL hardware and NOT a simulation !! |
|
|
o cientista
Joined: 14 May 2012 Posts: 5
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 3:36 pm |
|
|
I'm using the Proteus Simulation. But when I comment this line: #use i2c(MASTER, sda=PIN_C1, scl=PIN_C0, stream=I2CM) it gets. |
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 9221 Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 5:13 pm |
|
|
Sorry, but using Proteus is NOT the real world !
Nobody here will spend ANY time on this 'project' as Proteus is FULL of bugs, errors and faulty DRCs.
It is beyond any sane person to dive into such a crummy 'simulation' and rewrite their code (if allowed) to correct for the hundreds of errors easily spotted. It's actually far easier to buy PICs, breadboard them, cut code, download, test and debug...all in one day.....odds are real good you'll never get Proteus to 'function' correctly.
When you get real hardware up and running, we'll be happy to help out as we can easily test real hardware. |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|